Legal Opinion
Stein v. Krislov
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 8, 2010No. 1-09-3478PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lampkin
The question before us is whether we have jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order denying a motion to dismiss based upon the Citizen Participation Act (735 ILCS 110/1 et seq. (West Supp. 2007)). Defendants, Clinton Krislov and Krislov & Associates, Ltd. (K&A), filed the motion to dismiss in response to a libel action brought by plaintiff, Robert Stein. For the following reasons, we find that we lack jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order.
FACTS
Plaintiff is an attorney that was employed by K&A from 1994-2001. Krislov is the sole shareholder. After leaving K&A, plaintiff and his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- O'CONNELL v. St. Francis HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Almgren v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- The People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- TUNCA v. PainterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Ryan v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Stein v. KrislovAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- State Bank of Cherry v. CGB EnterprisesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- State Bank of Cherry v. CGB ENTERPRISESAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.