Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hover

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1921No. 4,871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fergus County; Boy E. Ayers, Judge. Action by James L. Martin and another, as guardians of Joseph Miller, an incompetent person, against Herbert A. Hover and others. From an order appointing a receiver, without notice, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reynolds

Plaintiffs, as guardians of the estate of Joseph Miller, an incompetent person, seek a decree declaring that defendants Herbert A. Hover and Harry H. Schwartz, Jr., are involun*304tary trustees, for Miller’s benefit, of a certain oil and gas lease issued by the United States government to them covering certain real estate in Fergus county. After filing the complaint and before time for appearance of defendants had expired, the plaintiffs, upon an ex parte application, procured an order appointing a receiver of the lease and oil to be produced. Defendants Hover and Schwartz have appealed from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BerberickMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hickey v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Montana Ranches Co. v. DolanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wright v. FlynnMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Prudential Securities Co. v. Three Forks, H. & M. Valley R.Montana Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. SchleiningMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bumgardner v. CoreyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API