Robertson v. Corsett
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeals from Barry. Foreclosures. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The bill in each of these cases was filed to foreclose a mortgage on the undivided half of certain lands. The controversy is the same in each, and concerns the right to certain fixtures, which are claimed by complainants as a part of the real estate,.but have been removed by the defendant George Baker, as personalty.
The land consists of about two acres, with saw-mill upon it. In 1866 the land was owned by Charles S. Corsett and one Miles, and a carding machine was then put in. Some time in 1871, Miles sold his undivided half of the premises to Stephen W. Walrath, and Walrath by arrangement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Voorhees v. . McGinnisNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Adams v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Davenport v. John G. Shants & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1871
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cullers v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Manwaring v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Morris v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.