Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Corsett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1878PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeals from Barry. Foreclosures. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The bill in each of these cases was filed to foreclose a mortgage on the undivided half of certain lands. The controversy is the same in each, and concerns the right to certain fixtures, which are claimed by complainants as a part of the real estate,.but have been removed by the defendant George Baker, as personalty.

The land consists of about two acres, with saw-mill upon it. In 1866 the land was owned by Charles S. Corsett and one Miles, and a carding machine was then put in. Some time in 1871, Miles sold his undivided half of the premises to Stephen W. Walrath, and Walrath by arrangement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. . McGinnisNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Adams v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Davenport v. John G. Shants & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1871

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cullers v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Manwaring v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Morris v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API