Legal Opinion

John V. Farwell & Co. v. Stick, Kemp & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from, Woodbury District Court. — Hon. A. Yan Wagenen, Judge. The firm of Stick, Kem-p & Co. was composed of Daniel Stick, his son D. L. Stick, and J. A. Kemp. In June, 1891, the firm engaged in a business of general merchandise in Sioux City, Iowa, and for that purpose it leased of the intervener State Bank Building Company, a building, and occupied 'the same. The interveners M. A. and L. J. Stick are the wives, respectively, of Daniel and D. L. Stick.

Read the full summary

Appeal from, Woodbury District Court. — Hon. A. Yan Wagenen, Judge. The firm of Stick, Kem-p & Co. was composed of Daniel Stick, his son D. L. Stick, and J. A. Kemp. In June, 1891, the firm engaged in a business of general merchandise in Sioux City, Iowa, and for that purpose it leased of the intervener State Bank Building Company, a building, and occupied 'the same. The interveners M. A. and L. J. Stick are the wives, respectively, of Daniel and D. L. Stick. During September and the early part of October, 1891, the firm of Stick, Kemp & On. shipped from its store in Sioux City, Iowa, to-…

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, C. J.

*901 *89I. It is important to first determine the ownership of the goods attached. The facts in support of the claim of M. A. and L. J. Stick to the ownership are substantially as follows: We have said that M. A. Stick is the wife of Daniel Stick, and that L. J. Stick is the wife of D. L. Stick. The firm of Grove & Co. consisted of M. A. and L. J. Stick and D. P. Grove. The terms' of the copartnership were that *90M. A. and L. J. Stick should furnish the capital and he the entire owners- of the property of the firm, and that Grove should be the salesman and do- the work for the firm, and receive a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strasberger v. Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API