Legal Opinion

Bertha Zinc & Mineral Co. v. Vaughan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia

Decided July 27, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL, District Judge.

The plaintiff is a corporation chartered under the laws of the state of New Jersey, and is a citizen of that state. It brings its bill in equity against J. P. Vaughan, administrator of one Michael Black, deceased, and the sureties on his official bond;. J. P. Vaughan and T. C. Vaughan, co-administrators of Michael' Black, deceased; the sureties on the official bond of said co-administrators; certain persons as distributees of the estate of said Michael Black, deceased; Clark Litterall; and B. F. G-arnett. The defendants are all citizens of the state of Virginia. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Ambler v. EppingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Van Bokkelen v. CookU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hale v. TylerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1902
  2. Smith v. PackardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  3. Estate of McLaughlin, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API