Legal Opinion

Bancharel v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1896No. Nos. 9918-(132)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court, for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

The defendant was the owner of a certain city lot in Duluth, on the front end of which the city had condemned a strip of land about 16 feet in width for the purpose of widening the street. Plaintiff purchased the property, and an executory agreement was drawn up and signed, by the terms of which defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff the lot according to the original *455plat, which would include the strip so condemned. Shortly after-wards, the deed was made, delivered, and recorded, conveying only the portion of the lot remaining after the strip was so condemned. This action was afterwards…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitney v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Olson v. ShephardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Lindquist v. GibbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Baas v. ZinkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Stoll v. NagleWyoming Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API