Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement v. Cessford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 2012No. 2D11-1761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

The Department of Revenue (DOR) challenges the trial court’s order requiring *1201DOR to return the income tax refund that it intercepted from Adam Cessford as a payment on his child support obligation. We affirm.

History

On October 7, 2008, an administrative law judge (ALJ) entered a final administrative support order determining that Cessford was the biological father of a child born May 29, 2007, and ordering him to pay $384 per month in child support. The ALJ also determined that Cessford should pay retroactive child support at the same rate of $334 per month for the period from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Cook v. CarrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Collins v. BrodzkiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Gomez v. VarelaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kenck v. CSED FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Fei Xu v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Ning ZhangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Fei Xu v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Ning ZhangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Jean Max Mathieu v. Department of Revenue, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API