Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement v. Cessford
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
The Department of Revenue (DOR) challenges the trial court’s order requiring *1201DOR to return the income tax refund that it intercepted from Adam Cessford as a payment on his child support obligation. We affirm.
History
On October 7, 2008, an administrative law judge (ALJ) entered a final administrative support order determining that Cessford was the biological father of a child born May 29, 2007, and ordering him to pay $384 per month in child support. The ALJ also determined that Cessford should pay retroactive child support at the same rate of $334 per month for the period from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Cook v. CarrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Collins v. BrodzkiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Gomez v. VarelaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenck v. CSED FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Fei Xu v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Ning ZhangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Fei Xu v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Ning ZhangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Jean Max Mathieu v. Department of Revenue, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026