Legal Opinion

Jean Renoir and Dido Freire Renoir v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1963No. 18237_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

Jean and Dido Renoir filed a petition with this court to review a decision of the Tax Court (37 T.C. 1180) involving their income tax liability for the years 1956 and 1957.

The facts are not in dispute. Petitioners arrived in France on October 1, 1953, and remained continuously in Europe until July 15, 1956. While in Europe, Jean Renoir performed personal services as a motion picture director and writer, and in 1956 received $35,000 as partial compensation for those services. In 1957 he received $10,000 as additional compensation for the services rendered while he was in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Renoir v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. Alan W. Ladd and Sue Carol Ladd v. Robert A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles, California, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Zaffaroni v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Ebberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  3. Bottome v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Fink v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Cornman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API