Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Merrimack River Savings Bank

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 1, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

On May 1, 1930, the plaintiff deposited in the Merrimack River Savings Bank the sum of $20,000. At that time the bank was insolvent, and it had been insolvent for several years prior thereto. The insolvency was caused by illegal manipulations of investments and accounts by the bank’s treasurer, Hale, who had concealed these practices and the bank’s condition from the trustees and other agents of the bank and from the Bank Commissioner. For several years Hale had known of the insolvency.

The plaintiff made arrangements for his deposit with Hale personally, and remained ignorant of the bank’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Denny, Banking Commissioner v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. People ex rel. Russel v. Michigan Avenue Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  4. Annis v. Security Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. George v. HullWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stefani v. Merrimack River Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API