Legal Opinion

In re Karwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent is a New Jersey attorney admitted to practice in New York by this Court in 1983.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent pursuant to section 806.19 of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.19) by reason of his recent suspension from the practice of law in New Jersey.

It appears from petitioner’s papers that by order dated March 9, 1993, the New Jersey Supreme Court suspended respondent from practice for a period of three months, effective April 12, 1993, for conduct adversely reflecting on his fitness to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In re SneedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API