Legal Opinion

County of Will v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1916Published

1Opinion of the Court

Statutes must be interpreted according to their intent and meaning and not always according to the letter; a thing within the statute, though not within the letter, and a thing within the letter is not within the statute, unless within the intention.

Perry v. Johnson County, 94 Ill. 214, 220;

Anderson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co., 117 Ill. 26, 28;

People ex rel v. Gaulter, 149 Ill. 39, 47;

People ex rel v. City of Chicago, 152 Ill. 546, 551.

In consturing a statute, the courts are not confined to the literal meaning of the words of the statute, but the intention is to be gathered from…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Castner v. WalrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. City of St. Louis v. MeintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. People ex rel. Keeney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API