Legal Opinion

Pier House Joint Venture v. Higgs

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 21, 1991No. 90-2356PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, Pier House Joint Venture, appeals a dismissal of its complaint contesting its ad valorem tax assessment. We affirm.

Appellant’s bold contentions of error fade to a whisper under the analysis of Markham v. Neptune Hollywood Beach Club, 527 So.2d 814 (Fla.1988). In Markham, the Florida Supreme Court interpreted the applicable provisions of chapter 194:

We agree that ... subsection (6) requires that the sixty-day requirement of subsection (2) be construed as a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim rather than as a statute of limitations.

Appellant was neither foreclosed access to the courts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Markham v. Neptune Hollywood Beach ClubSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barrett Tool Rental, Inc. v. Metropolitan Miami DadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API