Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PetitioN to Rei-ieae this case. For former decision without an opinion, see 131 N. C., 827.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This case is now before us on a rehearing. It was affirmed by a per curiam judgment on the authority of Pipkin v. Railroad, 128 N. C., 615, a case against the same defendant and involving a similar cause of action. The latter case was also decided without an opinion, as it was thought that the principles of law governing the case had been substantially settled. In his petition to rehear the plaintiff says: *337“It was error to decide this case by a per curia/m judgment, without an opinion in writing by the Court, containing its reasons in full.” We cannot admit the error so broadly assigned. It…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Everett v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. Munn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Merchants National Bank v. Carolina Broom Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- McConnell Bros. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.