Legal Opinion

Jewell-Loudermilk Co. v. Palmour Hardware Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1923No. 13435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. In a suit against a partnership for the value of merchandise alleged to have been sold to it by the plaintiff, evidence that certain of the goods were sold and delivered to one member of the partnership is not conclusive that they were sold to him individually and upon his own individual account. Since an individual member of a partnership is an agent for the partnership, and may under certain circumstances bind the partnership by his acts, and since merchandise bought by him and delivered to him personally may be bought through him acting within the scope of his authority as agent for the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bush v. FourcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Edenfield v. YoumansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API