Legal Opinion
Olivieri v. Adams
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 23, 1968No. Civ. A. 41217, 39045 and 40946PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
The motions before the court arise out of three separate personal injury suits instituted against Pennsylvania defendants on behalf of Pennsylvania minors. In each of the cases a foreign guardian was appointed for the minor, thereby creating the diversity of citizenship upon which this court’s jurisdiction is founded. 1 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). By the pending motions, the minors’ parents, who are also citizens and residents of Pennsylvania and, therefore, lack diversity of citizenship with defendants, seek to ]om as plaintiffs in these suits, either by amendment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Corabi v. Auto Racing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- McSparran v. WeistCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Parsons Corporation v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Karen Jean Hymer v. Benjamin K. Chal and Victoria Leilani ChaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hathi v. Krewstown Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.