In re the Accounting of Mass
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Withes, S.
In this judicial settlement proceeding respondent, Esther Pailthorpe, seeks allowances for her counsel in various proceedings had in this estate during the last five and more years.
*670The first services for which compensation from the estate is asked consisted of the institution by respondent of a compulsory accounting proceeding herein in 1946. The executors thereupon promptly filed their account. For bringing on such accounting proceeding respondent is not entitled to any allowance for counsel fees, but is entitled to apply for costs and disbursements upon the settlement of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matter of LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of LounsberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re the Estate of HirschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of VorndranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of AlcottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- Edelman v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the Estate of HughesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1997