Legal Opinion

People v. Marinez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 15, 1987No. 3-87-0005PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

Defendants Jimmy and Maria Marinez were charged with possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver. Prior to trial, the defendants filed a motion to quash the search warrant and to suppress the evidence based upon the constitutionally impermissible procedure employed by the police in executing the warrant. The defendants claim that the officers failed to knock on the door and announce their authority and the reasons for their presence prior to the execution of the warrant. The trial court granted the motion and the State filed a timely notice of appeal.

Prior to the search of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. OuelletteIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. WolgemuthIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. TierneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. People v. SaechaoIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. CurtisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. People v. AriasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. PolidoriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API