Legal Opinion
KANTZ v. AT&T, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00531Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PATRICE KANTZ, on behalf of CIVIL ACTION herself individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, NO. 20-531 v. AT&T, INC. and AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Joyner, J. 2021 March 19, Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Court Order to Compel Individual Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. I. Background Plaintiff Patrice Kantz brings this putative collective action claiming violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Michael Dasher v. RBC BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Patten Securities Corp., Inc. v. Diamond Greyhound & Genetics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.