Legal Opinion
United States v. Mulero-Vargas
United States District Court
Decided April 17, 2019No. Criminal No. 17-297 (FAB)Published
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
*168Defense counsel Jedrick Burgos-Amador ("Burgos") and Ricardo Lozada-Franco ("Lozada") request that the Court reconsider the imposition of sanctions and the disgorgement of attorneys' fees. (Docket No. 213.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
I. Background
On May 10, 2017, a grand jury charged defendants José Mulero-Vargas ("Mulero") and Luis Merced-García ("Merced") with possession of a machinegun in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and possession with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Iverson v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Venegas-Hernandez v. Sonolux RecordsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Biltcliffe v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.