Bowman v. Lee
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Davies Courtly Common Fleas.
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge
The plaintiffs bring ejectment, and rely upon a United-States patent to their ancestor. Defendant relies upon the statute of limitations, and claims to be an innocent purchaser without notice. The case was submitted to a jury upon elaborate instructions, who gave a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was rendered.
This is one of the numerous cases that are improperly brought into this court. The record is a long one, and shows no error. Appellant complains of the instructions, but they give the law in relation to adverse possession carefully and correctly. They show that possession,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Boyce v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilkerson v. EilersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Hunnewell v. BurchettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Himmelberger-Harrison Lumber Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.