Legal Opinion
Personal Pool of Manhattan, Inc. v. Dinanno
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided October 31, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBurton S. Sherman, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment urging that the defendant’s answer did not comply with the requirements of CPLR 3016 (subd. [f]) in an action involving a claim for the performing of labor or services.
The rule states in pertinent part:- “In an action involving * * * the performing of labor or services * * * the plaintiff may set forth and number in his verified complaint the items of his claim and the reasonable value or agreed price of each. Thereupon the defendant by his verified answer shall indicate specifically those items he disputes and whether in respect of delivery or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Innis, Pearce & Co. v. G. H. Poppenberg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Arel, Inc. v. Optics Manufacturing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- B & C Smith, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981