Legal Opinion

Gill v. Gill

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1986No. 19142Published

1DissentZimmerman, Justice

I dissent. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it found that Mr. Gill did not violate an injunction prohibiting him “from encumbering or disposing of in any manner whatsoever, any assets or properties of ... Gill’s Tire Market, Inc., or Fleetway, Inc., without the express, prior knowledge and approval of [Mrs. Gill] or without first obtaining an appropriate court order after notice and applica-tion_” (Emphasis added.) There is no conflict in the evidence that at the time the injunction was entered, pursuant to Mr. Gill’s stipulation, the marital estate included the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Weston v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898
  4. Gunnison Irr. Co. v. Peterson.Utah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API