Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Bauer

Yamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon

Decided May 11, 2016No. CV030231; A153944Published

1Opinion of the Court

SERCOMBE, R J.

In 1956, Sylva Kerr deeded property in trust to two of her children for the benefit of all of her descendents. That deed was inconsistent with the common-law rule against perpetuities. The trustees attempted to reconvey the property to Kerr by deed. Kerr then deeded the property outright to three of her children. The property was later conveyed to a family trust. Three of Kerr’s descendents brought suit to cancel the later deeds and quiet title to the property in the original trustees. The trial court granted that relief and modified the 1956 deed to correct the rule against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Closset v. BurtchaellOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Allen v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. City of Klamath Falls v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API