Legal Opinion

People v. Salvador

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*916OPINION OF THE COURT

Philip J. Chetta, J.

Defendant’s motion, submitted May 7, 1998, seeks a dismissal of the indictment upon a claim that (1) her right to have counsel present in the Grand Jury (CPL 190.52) was violated, and (2) her right to testify in the narrative was impaired by actions of the District Attorney.

At the outset the court notes that it has reviewed the Grand Jury minutes in their entirety.

Defense counsel represents without contradiction that the New York City Department of Correction did not produce his client to testify until 4:20 p.m. on April 9, 1998 at which time he began…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. AdessaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. SmaysNew York Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  2. People v. JulesNew York Supreme Court, Queens County · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API