Legal Opinion

Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Light & Heat Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 19, 1916No. 163-BPublished

In Equity. Suit by the Safety Car Heating and Lighting Company against the United States Light & Heat Corporation. On supplemental bill by complainant, and counterclaim by defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The bill alleges infringement of Creveling patent, No. 747,686, dated December 22, 1903, which was adjudicated valid and infringed as to claims 1 to 8, inclusive, in a prior action against the predecessor of the defendant company. See Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co. (D. C.) 222 Fed. 310, affirmed 223 Fed. 1023, 138 C. C. A. 651.

*647[1] The present defendant is charged with marketing a structure embodying the essentials of the adjudicated patent. The claims insisted upon are the third, sixth, and eighth, but it will suffice to set out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Brooks v. FiskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1914
  4. Overweight Counterbalance Elevator Co. v. Improved Order of Red Men's Hall Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Lighting & Heating Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API