Legal Opinion
United Farm Workers v. Solis
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 2010No. Civil Action No.: 09-0062 (RMU)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary-judgment. The plaintiffs, two farm workers’ unions and eight individual farm workers, contend that the defendant, Department of Labor (“DOL”) violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., when it promulgated the most recent adverse effect wage rate (“AEWR”) provisions of the H-2A foreign agricultural-worker program. The court denies the plaintiffs’ motion for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Matthew Beauschesne v. Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusiveDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Overdevest Nurseries, L.P. v. AcostaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United Farm Workers v. The United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020