Williams v. Giddens

1. The evidence submitted in behalf of the applicants did not require a finding that the proeessioners had run and marked a. line between the adjoining lands of the applicants and the protestant where no boundary line had been previously located and established; and1 therefore the court did not err in overruling the motion of the protestant to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that the proeessionershad run and marked a new line.

2. “Where actual possession has been had, under a claim of right, for more than seven years, such claim shall be respected,” by the processioners in cases of…