Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bates

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2003No. 1D02-0399Published

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, J.

This appeal arises from a claim on a commercial all-risk insurance policy. We affirm the trial court’s ruling in favor of the insured, because the settling that damaged the structures on the insured’s property was not the type of normal settling connoted by the exclusions clause of the policy.

Appellant issued a commercial all-risk insurance policy to Appellee on her rental home. Unbeknownst to either Appellant or Appellee, construction debris was buried in the ground beneath the home. When the debris began to decay, it caused the ground to slowly cave in and, in turn, the structures on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barash v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Winters v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
  3. Medina v. Brabert Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API