Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 1989No. 88-1332PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant raises three points on appeal. While we conclude the first point to be without merit, we find merit in the others.

The trial court, in our view, did not adequately address each of the statutory criteria for imposing adult sanctions, as required by section 39.111(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1987). See Leonard v. State, 522 So.2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) and cases cited therein. Furthermore, as the state concedes, the trial court imposed $200 in court costs without prior notice to the defendant and an opportunity for him to be heard. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Leonard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blocker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API