Legal Opinion · Dissent

Redwitz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 17, 1998No. 96-02033Published

1Dissent

MILLS, STANLEY R., Associate Judge,

dissenting.

For the following reasons, I respectfully dissent.

During closing argument, the prosecutor indicated to the jury that the State did not have the burden to disprove voluntary intoxication. There was no objection to this argument; however, when counsel for the appellant responded that the burden of proof stays with the State and that the burden of proof does not shift to the appellant, the prosecutor objected to this proposition, asserting that it was an improper statement of the law. The prosecutor’s objection was sustained by the trial court.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. United States v. Joseph John SegnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Romero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Heddleson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API