Legal Opinion

Nichols v. King

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buknett

The question involved is, whether or not the plaintiff has a right to sue out her summons first and file her declaration later, as provided by the general law of this State or whether she must file her declaration when she sues out her summons according to the provisions of Chapter 430 of the Private Acts of 1917.

The plaintiff in error sued out her summons on July 5, 1949, and it was served that day on the defendant in error and was returnable to the first Monday in August, 1949. On July 22, 1949, and before any steps had been taken in the suit by the defendant in error, the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Prescott v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Grainger County v. State ex rel. MynattTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Myar v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. Hancock v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Donald Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee, and John Knox Walkup, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Flynn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Richie v. Liberty Cash Grocers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  4. Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Donald Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee, and John Knox Walkup, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Schneider v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API