Pattridge v. Starks
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.
|!Billy Joe Edwards challenges a damage award- of $600,000 against him and in favor of Endurall, Inc., for the violation of a noncompete agreement. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
The background of this dispute is set forth in Pattridge v. Starks, 50,135 (La.App.2d Cir.11/18/15), 181 So.3d 192 (“Pattridge II”). Briefly, in 2004, four investors 1 formed a Louisiana company, Endu-rall, Inc., to manufacture and sell rod guides to the oil and gas industry. The investors all signed a noncompete agreement stating that if any of them were terminated as shareholders, they would not compete…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- AL SMITH'S PLUMBING ETC. v. River Crest, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.