Legal Opinion

Pattridge v. Starks

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 2016No. 50,351-CAPublished

1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.

|!Billy Joe Edwards challenges a damage award- of $600,000 against him and in favor of Endurall, Inc., for the violation of a noncompete agreement. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS

The background of this dispute is set forth in Pattridge v. Starks, 50,135 (La.App.2d Cir.11/18/15), 181 So.3d 192 (“Pattridge II”). Briefly, in 2004, four investors 1 formed a Louisiana company, Endu-rall, Inc., to manufacture and sell rod guides to the oil and gas industry. The investors all signed a noncompete agreement stating that if any of them were terminated as shareholders, they would not compete…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. AL SMITH'S PLUMBING ETC. v. River Crest, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API