Legal Opinion

United States v. Mullins

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1902No. 1,014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This cause consists of the consolidation of three actions brought to recover, upon three warehousing bonds executed and delivered by Dwight A. Aiken, as principal, and Alfred R. Mullins, as surety, certain taxes alleged to be due and unpaid on account of a quantity of distilled spirits entered and bonded at the distillery of Aiken, at Lexington, Ky. The bonds were given upon three several entries for the months of March, April and June, respectively, in 1881. On August 9, 1883, the United States having purchased some of the spirits, the secretary of the treasury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. WigglesworthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
  5. Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dayton Brass Castings Co. v. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
  3. Wright v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Flight Options, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API