Legal Opinion

Onabiyi v. District of Columbia Taxicab Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1989No. 87-1322 to 87-1324, 87-1400 and 87-1424PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

The District of Columbia Taxicab Commission (DCTC) found that each of the petitioners had operated a taxicab in the District of Columbia without a hacker’s license, in violation of D.C.Code § 4071719(a) (1986 Repl.), and imposed civil fines. Petitioners contend that the offenses should have been brought before the Bureau of Traffic Adjudication (BTA), and that the DCTC was without jurisdiction. We affirm.

I

Section 40-1719(a) provides in pertinent part that no person may operate a taxicab within the District without first procuring all applicable licenses required by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Graham v. BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Speyer v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Dial a Car, Inc. v. Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. Hun Kim Lim v. District of Columbia Taxicab CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Edward v. District of Columbia Taxicab CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API