Legal Opinion

State v. Phoenix

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2010No. C-100103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} The lack of a sufficient amount of evidence demonstrating impairment precludes a finding of probable cause that a driver is operating his motor vehicle while impaired and makes any subsequent arrest — based only on that insufficient evidence — improper.

*129I. Unlit Headlights Lead to Stop and Arrest

{¶ 2} On August 2, 2009, at about 10:30 PM, Sergeant Matthew Hamilton of the Ohio State Highway Patrol observed defendant-appellant Kristopher Phoenix driving without his headlights illuminated on River Road in Cincinnati. Phoenix’s running lights and taillights,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. DetersOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. Fisher, C-080497 (5-15-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RubergOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. BremenkampOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. GreeneOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. CarnesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. PitroffOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API