State v. Phoenix
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} The lack of a sufficient amount of evidence demonstrating impairment precludes a finding of probable cause that a driver is operating his motor vehicle while impaired and makes any subsequent arrest — based only on that insufficient evidence — improper.
*129I. Unlit Headlights Lead to Stop and Arrest
{¶ 2} On August 2, 2009, at about 10:30 PM, Sergeant Matthew Hamilton of the Ohio State Highway Patrol observed defendant-appellant Kristopher Phoenix driving without his headlights illuminated on River Road in Cincinnati. Phoenix’s running lights and taillights,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. DetersOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. Fisher, C-080497 (5-15-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RubergOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BremenkampOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. GreeneOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. CarnesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. PitroffOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.