Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Burns

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1922No. 6424. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

This suit was originally brought against the Port Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company, but Wm. G. Mc-Adoo, Director General of Railroads, being in control of the railway at the time the cause of action accrued, was substituted as defendant below, and in turn John Barton Payne, Agent, was substituted.

It was alleged by the plaintiffs that, on April 1, 1918, they made a verbal contract with the defendant McAdoo and his agent, for the furnishing on April 8th of 26 cars, to move 867 head of cattle, which they tendered for shipment to defendant at Brown-wood, Tex., on the last-named date, to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Southern Express Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. BeahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herrin Transp. Co. v. MarmionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. El Paso & S. W. R. Co. v. KeebleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Port of Beaumont Navigation District of Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API