Legal Opinion

Hill v. Long

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1956No. 5990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIKER, Justice.

This suit was for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.

Long, defendant-appellant herein, as seller, and one Wheeler, as purchaser, entered into a verbal agreement whereby Wheeler was to purchase certain real estate from Long. Wheeler paid $400 down on the purchase price and was let into possession of the property for the purpose of making such changes, alterations or additions to the building thereon as would make it suit his purposes. Wheeler, being in possession of the property, employed plaintiff, a carpenter, to do the work of alteration or addition.

The agreement between Long…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petrakis v. KrasnowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Skidmore v. EbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Montevista Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Freidenbloom v. Pecos Valley Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gray v. New Mexico Pumice Stone Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ray Suiter & Son Construction Co. v. Allied Contract BuyersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. White Sands Constr. v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API