Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1941No. 21604PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for keeping and exhibiting, for the purpose of gaming, a gaming device, to-wit: a marble machine, and was found guilty by the jury and assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

This is the second appeal of this case, the former being reported in 138 Tex. Cr. R, 486, 137 S. W. (2d) 34.

*497It was contended by the State that appellant and one F. E. Von Mockel entered into a conspiracy with one Fermenter to place certain marble machines in different places in Houston, and that appellant would receive one-half of the proceeds therefrom and Fermenter the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bevins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Hannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Tew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Marlow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Ray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  5. Tew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API