Stanley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Judge.
Appellant was indicted for keeping and exhibiting, for the purpose of gaming, a gaming device, to-wit: a marble machine, and was found guilty by the jury and assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.
This is the second appeal of this case, the former being reported in 138 Tex. Cr. R, 486, 137 S. W. (2d) 34.
*497It was contended by the State that appellant and one F. E. Von Mockel entered into a conspiracy with one Fermenter to place certain marble machines in different places in Houston, and that appellant would receive one-half of the proceeds therefrom and Fermenter the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bevins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Hannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1879
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Tew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Marlow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Ray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Tew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.