Legal Opinion

Hart v. Riverside Hospital, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 5, 1995No. Civ. A. 4:95cv45PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

Plaintiff Carlis Hart (“Hart”) brings a suit against Defendant Riverside Hospital, Ine. (“Riverside”) under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTA-LA”), 42 U.S.C.S. § 1395dd (1993). Presently before the court is a motion by Plaintiff to amend her complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On July 16, 1993, Plaintiff was in the last weeks of her pregnancy, and went to Riverside to have her baby delivered at approximately 7:00 a.m. that day. Complaint, ¶¶ 6, 7. She was placed in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Morin v. Eastern Maine Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
JGB Industries, Inc. v. Simon-Telelect, Inc. (In Re JGB Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997