Legal Opinion

Morris v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice, J., at January Term, 1916, of McDowell.

1Opinion of the Court

Clabe:, 0. J.

This is an appeal from a nonsuit. The plaintiff was driving a spike about 6 inches long into a cross-tie, which had been driven in two-thirds of its length when his hammer slipped off the head of the spike, striking the tie 2 inches below. The allegation-is that this caused the plaintiff to sprain his back. He alleges that the face of the hammer was worn slick and that he had been promised a new hammer, and that, besides, he was standing on a pile of loose dirt, and that, a train being expected, he was ordered by the section foreman to hurry up and get the tie in place before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Bryan v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Lassiter v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winborne v. Interstate Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Rogerson v. . HontzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. McCord v. . Harrison-Wright Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Robinson v. J. B. Ivey & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. McKinney v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API