Legal Opinion

Friedeman v. Kinnen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1973No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

This is an appeal from a decree of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas dismissing the appellant’s complaint in equity seeking the reformation of a bond and mortgage. The only issue presented at trial and the only issue present in this appeal is whether the appellant, William Friedeman, was competent to testify in view of the provisions of the Act of May 23, 1887, P. L. 158, §5(e), 28 P.S. §322, commonly known as the “Dead Man’s Act”. * Tlie lower court held that appellant’s testimony was barred by the statute and, since there was no other testimony,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hendrickson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Ford EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Zabek EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hera v. McCormickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. In re Estate of PetroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. In Re the Estate of BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. In Re Estate of EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Estate of Fiorento Cerullo, Appeal of: Velleca, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API