Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Huff v. Reeves

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1940No. 28232PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

Chapter 94, Laws of 1937, p. 383 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), §§ 5167 to 5170-7 [P. C. §§ 2157-51 to 2157-60], inclusive), provides “for an exclusive method by which minor parties may nominate candidates for public office.” Briefly, the act provides that, upon notice given as prescribed in the act, twenty-five or more registered voters may assemble on primary election day, hold a convention, adopt a party name and principles, and nominate candidates for public office. The act requires that the nominations be certified to the secretary of state in a certain manner, and that the certificate of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kessler v. StreckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Antolish v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. McAulay v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Nostrand v. BalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API