Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Crooks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Circuit Court eor Clarke Count?.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Henry Daniel and J. S. Magowan entered into bond to Edward Stockton and many others, stockholders of the Mountsterling Independent Bank. Among the obligees named, are the complainant, and also Daniel and Magowan, the obligors, who were themselves stockholders.

The condition of the bond recites, that Daniel had undertaken to settle up the business of the Bank; to pay all its debts to individuals, and to redeem its paper in circulation, when demanded at Mountsterling, in banking hours, according to the conditions of the charter, in Kentucky or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van Winkle v. BlackfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Alfalfa Lumber Co. v. HopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Sims v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  4. Cecil v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API