Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Dunshie

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2017No. 16-30264Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant-Appellant Michael Dunshie appeals an order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review de novo. United States v. Spears, 824 F.3d 908, 912 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court did not have jurisdiction to grant Dunshie’s motion. Because Dunshie was sentenced after the district court accepted the parties’ Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement, he is not eligible for relief under § 3582(c)(2) unless “the district court’s ‘decision to accept the plea and impose the recommended…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. United States v. Tyrone DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Adolph Spears, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API