Grant v. Superior Ct. in and for County of Pima
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Petitioner has been ordered to pay temporary spousal maintenance and other sums, all flowing from a common law marriage which he claims never occurred. He alleges an excess of the trial court’s jurisdiction in refusing to dismiss the action. We choose to assume jurisdiction of the matter and, since a court only has jurisdiction to award spousal maintenance in a dissolution proceeding governing a valid marriage and the situation before us is not a valid marriage, we believe the trial court did exceed its jurisdiction and we vacate its order.
The real party in interest…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Underwriters v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Humphreys v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Estate of TriggArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Kennedy v. DamronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Melton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Etienne v. DKM Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Estate of BiviansNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of Estate of LambNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.