Legal Opinion
Consolidated Plan of Connecticut, Inc. v. Bonitatibus
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
The plaintiff had a judgment against the defendants in an action on contract and brought this action upon it to recover a balance due. The defendants pleaded discharges in bankruptcy as a special defense. The plaintiff replied that the original debt was a loan secured by fraudulent representations and that the judgment, by virtue of Section 17a (2) of the Bankruptcy Act as amended in 1903 (11 U. S. C. A., § 35), relating to liabilities incurred as a result of obtaining money by false representations, was not discharged. The defendants denied fraud and pleaded the Statute of Limitations as to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Zimmern v. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Ames v. MoirSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. GolomboskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Public Finance Corp. v. XarhakosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
- Associates Discount Corp. v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
- Kuzemchak v. PitchfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- E. Ingraham Employees Federal Credit Union v. DoyleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.