Legal Opinion
State v. Baca
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1990No. 11514PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRED T. HENSLEY, District Judge.
The state indicted defendant for conspiracy to commit armed robbery, armed robbery, and aggravated burglary, all with use of a firearm. After trial, a jury found him guilty of all counts. The court imposed judgment and sentence on the convictions. Defendant abandoned two issues he raised in his docketing statement by not arguing them in his briefs. See State v. Fish, 102 N.M. 775, 701 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.1985). He raises two issues pursuant to a timely motion to amend his docketing statement. See State v. Rael, 100 N.M. 193, 668 P.2d 309 (Ct.App.1983).
We…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. BankertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. CavanaughNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. RackleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.