Legal Opinion

Claude Neon Federal Co. of Shreveport v. Angell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1934No. 4714PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff, in keeping with a written contract with defendants, prepared, delivered, and installed for them an electrical advertising sign, with accessories, and a system of wiring and operating devices, all of which, the printed contract declares, “shall remain the property of the Company” (plaintiff). Defendants agreed to keep and use said sign for three years continuously. They paid $17 cash on the contract when it was signed and agreed to pay that amount monthly for thirty-six consecutive months. There was written in the contract at time of its execution the following:…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. Louis Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Overland Texarkana Co. v. BickleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Griffin v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
  5. Grapico Bottling Works v. Liquid Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Succession of DunhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Hewitt v. Safeway Ins. Co. of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Varacalle v. TurnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. In re Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API