Legal Opinion
Parmley v. Missouri Dental Board
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided November 18, 1986No. 67690PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONNELLY, Judge.
Appellant Parmley filed a Complaint with the Administrative Hearing Commission seeking an order that would declare that he had satisfied the requirements for certification as a pedodontist without examination pursuant to § 332.171.1, RSMo Cum.Supp. 1984, and direct the Missouri Dental Board to issue him a specialty license. The license would enable him to advertise his specialty consistent with the provisions of § 332.321, RSMo Cum.Supp.1984. The Complaint was dismissed and plaintiff then sought judicial review of the Administrative Hearing Commission’s actions, and a…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission v. WatersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Union Electric Co. d/b/a Ameren Missouri v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- State, Department of Labor & Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards v. Board of Public Utilities of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Craven v. State Ex Rel. Premium Standard Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gasconade County Counseling Services, Inc. v. Missouri Department of Mental HealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.