Legal Opinion

Timken Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1985No. 84-990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

R.C. 5701.03 reads in pertinent part: “As used in Title LVII of the Revised Code, ‘personal property’ includes every tangible thing which is the subject of ownership, whether animate or inanimate, other than patterns, jigs, dies, or drawings, which are held for use and not for sale in the ordinary course of business * * (Emphasis added.) As to the definition of the terms “patterns,” “jigs” and “dies,” the Revised Code is silent. Appellant contends that a general lexicon definition should apply, and that the meaning applied to these items by the Board of Tax Appeals was overbroad and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. American Book Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Libby-Owens-Ford Co. v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A. Schulman, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API